Browse Exhibits (24 total)
Overview -hyper/over sexualization of Black women.
The hyper/over sexulization of black women is a phenomeon that portrays Black women as sexually exotic and promiscuous depriving them of any type of innocence.When we go back in history Enslaved women were considered property and were stripped of all basic human rights even of their own bodies ,and often were subjected to cruel and unusual sexual punishments. Enslaved women were often subjected to rape from white slave owners to fulfill their sick sexual desires. Slave owners also controlled and coerced. enslaved women into sexual positions and relationships, controlling who enslaved women laid with and had kids with , and if anybody refused they would be beaten. For my project I am going to discuss the hyper sexulization of black women in the media,video games ,history , televison and a couple other avenues and the harm sexual sterotypes have on black women.
Environmental Racisms Impact on Minorities
Introduction
In this exhibit I focus on environmental racism/ residential segregation which is a form of racism in which hazardous waste is disproportionately placed in communities of color, creating disparities among them. I look at the history of redlining in the United States and see how that impacts the health of people in those respective areas. I show two examples of environmental racism, the cancer alley in Mississippi and nuclear colonialism in New Mexico.
Overview Essay
Redlining
Redlining refers to the discrimination that happens when banks, insurance companies, etc., map out who loans are going to. This involves the refusal of loans, mortgages and insurance and how they are limited to certain people. The history of redlining is a diblilitating. The term itself redlining refers to the redlines on maps that separate “hazardous” predominantly- black neighborhoods. The use of the map started in the 1930s , when the Home Owners Loan Corporation and the Federal Home Loan Board would use this map to deny loans and investment services to African Americans. In 1934, The National Housing Act was passed , providing loans strictly to white neighborhoods. The Federal Housing association acts as a source of housing reassurance for home buyers. It is key to know they have played a huge role in housing segregation throughout history. In which they promote restrictive covenants, which mainly included preventing houses to be sold to African Americans. Their loans were also at one point only being used in white neighborhoods. Another important piece of information is that, If black people were able to buy homes in white neighborhoods, the FHA would not insure anyone in that neighborhood because they’re now looked at as a threat to integration.
Access to loans in African American Communities
As stated before it is harder for African American to get loans from banks for many different reason but it all comes back to race and social inequality. Racial discrimination has caused an undereduction of financial well being in the black community. The lack of resources and education throughout history has created what is referred to as the “ Wealth gap” between black people and white people. Which reveals that the median net worth for white families is 8x as much as black families.
Gentrification
Gentrification refers to the process when wealthier people move into poor neighborhoods and change housing, which changes the quality of that neighborhood. One common example is New York, we go there as tourists to see the bright lights and get the vibe from this big city but what we don't see is the increase of rent, decline in diversity and expulsion of residents. Along with higher rent, gentrification can have a very negative impact on neighborhood efficacy, decreasing social cohesion and need for social control. This can lead to what is called white fight and white flight. White Fight the resistance to integration of diversifying within neighborhoods, by white people towards black people. They began to riot and do everything in their power to get black people out of “ their neighborhoods”. When the act of white fight fails, the result is white flight. White Flight involves the migration of white people from integrated areas/ neighborhoods.Take Ruby Bridges as an example. American Civil Rights activist and the first black person to go to an all white school in the 1960s. Even as a young child Bridges had to experience discrimination, harassment and hatred all because she challenged segregation . When those actions failed, white parents pulled their children out of school in efforts to stop integration.
Eminent Domain
Eminent Domain is the idea of compensation without consent. Eminent domains often target low SES areas and neighborhoods because of their lack of financial or political power to demand change. Low SES areas tend to be largely black or latino making the minority population an objective target. Properties or land are cleared out for areas that must be useful to the public, often these are freeways, pipelines and other methods of public use.
NIMBY
“Not in my backyard” is a slogan made by people and communities subjected to and surrounded by harsh chemicals. Landfills and other wastelands emit harmful pollutants and toxins both into the and sometimes even drinking water. A second perspective debates that due to the knowledge that these minority communities lack the power to have these substances removed, this is why they are disproportionately placed there. This also depletes the market demand for these homes, making it harder to move out. These kinds of disparities leave more than enough space to develop/contract unavoidable illness or disease. Flint, Michigan for example STILL suffering to find a sufficient source of drinking water: a crisis they’ve been facing since April of 2014. Flint is in the top 5 of the poorest but also blackest cities in Michigan. Our very own community is on a pedestal for health disparity and lack of basic human needs. In this cae drinking water.
Life Expectancy
Life expectancy is among the most basic measures of a population's health, it's crucial to point out the trend that something as simple as the neighborhood you live in can determine your life expectancy. In fact an article states that “We found a 19.6 (±0.6) year gap in life expectancy between the socio demographic groups with the longest life expectancy (highest SES quintile of Asian females; 84.9 years) and the shortest (lowest SES quintile of African American males; 65.3 years).” This observation, based on a large and representative US population, confirms prior reports of a mortality disparity between African-Americans and whites after accounting for various measures of SES.
Well Being
The neighborhoods that we live in can affect our wellbeing, one prime example is policies that holistically improve the physical quality of neighborhoods for example, policies that simultaneously improve the conditions of housing, that create engaging public spaces, that enhance walkability, reduce reliance on automobile transportation, and promote mixed land use. These physical changes will not only enhance the physical qualities that we think might be relevant to health but will also trigger changes in health-relevant social environments.
Morbidity
In relation to gentrification, a study actually shows relocated public housing residents reported more physical and mental health problems and poorer self-reported health compared to current residents of the broader community. Essentially when people are removed and reallocated from their neighborhoods they experience more health issues.
Food Deserts
Food insecurity is a lack of consistent access to enough food for every person in a household to live an active, have a healthy lifestyle. In lower SES areas, there a lot of food deserts where. Another problem low-income residents face is accessing grocery stores. Even if the funds were available to purchase healthy food, there may not be a grocery store that is geographically accessible to those residents. This lack of access to a grocery store is typically referred to as a food desert
The Reification of Race in Ads
This project represents how the reification of race is shown in social structures and 'norms' in the United States in commercial representation.
Race and the Experience of Refugees
Welcome to my exhibit!
In this virtual experience you will learn about the ways in which race and anthropological work intertwines with refugees, overall aiming to make light of the inaccurate connotations of these individuals and how these depictions of them change the policies that are made, the enforcements of such, and the realistic conditions of their livelihood. In order to get a better understanding of the realities of being a refugee, we will look specifically at Lesvos, Greece, as it is one of the main hubs of refugee inflow. In this exhibit there are five various subtopics: Importance of Language, Why Flee?, Positive and Negative Connotations, Policies and its Enforcement, and Lesvos, Greece: Realistic Conditions. After these main subtopics, you will find the resource page along with some helpful resources that will help to get you involved.
As you move through this exhibit, each page is designed to add more and more information onto the subject, hoping to illustrate a vivid image of what it is like to be a refugee in today’s society. Each page alone provides a brick to the foundation, but together, it creates the building.
OVERVIEW ESSAY
The first page of this exhibit is entitled “Importance of Language”. It is within this page that you will gain an understanding of the three different labels a traveler can possess: refugee, migrant, and asylum seeker. It is important to recognize and employ the correct terminology as different labels have certain distinctions that provide distinct protections under the law. For example, gaining status as a refugee awards you protection under international law; whereas, being a migrant, you are not protected by that law. In this page you will learn how certain governments will intentionally use the migrant label in order to refuse the rights and protections provided for refugees. Following this page is “Why Flee”. This page houses statistics of the countries in which most refugees originate from as well as the reason for the displacement. I included two items on this page, one being a graph of some important statistics, and the other being a graph detailing the countries that produce the most refugees. The reason for the inclusion of this graph was to demonstrate just how much the influx of refugees was in around 2015 to aid in understanding how it became known as the Refugee Crisis of 2015. The second graph provides supporting information to the text, indicating the reasons that so many refugees fled. The next page is “Positive and Negative Connotations” which first gives an overview of regional opinions on refugees. As the page continues, you read what important political figures all around the world have to say, both positive and negative. Each section also contains a brief theory as to why individuals and countries occupy such perspectives of refugees. The subsequent page is “Policies and its Enforcements”. This page gives a detailed account of the Biden Administration’s proposed “Asylum Ban”, an international agency called Frontex, and two universal approaches to managing the refugee crisis (pushbacks and criminalization of humanitarian work). In order to give an encompassing viewpoint, this page encompasses what these policies or agencies are doing on paper in juxtaposition with what happens in actuality. Incorporated in this page are five items: an image of a fishing boat crammed full with refugees, a protest at the White House exhibiting the support citizens have for refugees, and three images showcasing the human rights violation and abuse that Frontex perpetuates. The image of the fishing boat was introduced to illustrate the realistic experience refugees endure on their voyage and supports the understanding of the concept of pushbacks explained at the end of the page. There are three images to explain Frontex as it paints the picture of the extent of the abuse of power. The last page works to add the final piece to the puzzle. As mentioned previously, while reading through this exhibit you receive many statistics and loaded information, but this page gives a more individualistic perspective reminding you that these are people just like you and me. It takes you to the island of Lesvos, Greece, detailing the story of Boye and giving you a look into Europe’s largest and most notorious refugee camp. The first item on this page is a map of the island to demonstrate the size and geographical location of this island, the second represents the emotions refugees experience when they finally reach their destination. The third is a screenshot of an article about Boye, a Ghanaian refugee who discussed some of the traumas he endured on his trek to Greece. The last two images work together elucidating just what this camp was like along with the devastation of the fire that took place.
In regards to how this project encompasses some of the topics that we have talked about in class, there are three to note: racialization and racial classification, whiteness and white supremacy, and contemporary racial associations. Racial classification goes hand in hand with the information discussed in the media project. With racial classifications comes unmarked designations and this is especially prominent in the page about refugee connotations. Part of the reason for negative perspectives of refugees is because countries see differing physical characteristics or societal values and assume it will bring about difficulties when attempting to incorporate themselves. They are seen as a threat to their economy and/or to their group's cultural values, traditions, and ideologies. Because of unmarked designations and racial classifications, there is more hesitation in offering refuge to those that don’t fit the perceived standard of what an individual should look like. In terms of whiteness, the acceptance of refugees changes on a case by case basis allowing for discrimination in regards to race to take place. Take the U.S. in response to the Ukrainian Refugee crisis. The Biden Administration provided guidance to those seeking asylum and exempted them from Title 42; whereas, there are many Central American, African’s, and Haitians that await approval at the border. This enforces the concept that the enforcement of immigration policies are done in racist ways, in which White, mostly Chrsitian refugees are accepted at a disproportionate rate. As defined in our class, “White Supremacy is an historically based, institutionally perpetuated systems of exploitation and oppression of continents, nations, and peoples of color by white peoples and nations of the Europeans continent, for the purpose of maintaining and defending a system of wealth, power and privilege” By neglecting the refuge of others, yet prioritizing that of European originating asylum seekers, it illuminates the efforts that the United States makes in order to maintain the white hierarchy that is present. Lastly, this topic intertwines with contemporary racial associations in terms of the era of technosecurity. In the article “Race, Racism, and Identification in the Era of Technosecurity”, the author David Skinner discussed the interaction between facial recognition software, border security, and racial discrimination by stating, “In the case of border regime, race is an absence-presence, officially denied but evident in the experiences it generates” (Skinner, 2018, p. 4). He goes on to mention how Europe specifically illustrates “...how contemporary borders facilitate mobilities but, as Étienne Balibar (2002) argues, are by function ‘polysemic’ generating different experiences and outcomes for different social groups” (Skinner, 2018, p. 8). This directly correlates to the Biden Administration policy of using CBP One, an app which uses facial recognition software to make port entry appointments that has been causing an increase in racial discrimination.
Throughout this project I have learned both personally and academically. In terms of my personal growth, this project has revitalized the passion that I had for this topic upon my return from my study abroad trip. This illuminated and strengthened the emotions that I felt for the treatment that refugees experienced prior to their courageous departure, during their journey, and in a new country. Another aspect of personal growth was in terms of awareness. I live in a world where I experience very different realities; therefore, it can be easy to ignore the conflicts that are happening around the world and underneath my nose. Learning more about this crisis has aided in my cultural and societal awareness for what is going on around me. It helped to pop the comfortable bubble that I often place myself in. Academically speaking, I had a rough understanding of this topic; however, this broadened and deepened my knowledge of the refugee crisis. A page that particularly expanded my knowledge was “Policies and its Enforcements”. Prior to this media project, I was unaware of the circumstances happening around me with the Biden Administration; to learn about this and the effects that his proposed policy would have were especially eye-opening. With what we learned over the course of this semester, it was interesting to witness the parallels and see how our class topics of race intertwined in what I was studying.
Aiden and Yuanpei on Race, Gender, and Sport
Hello All and welcome to our Webpage! As you will see throughout the following pages, we have collected many items that will highlight the relationship race and gender have with sports. I had originally settled on this topic due to my lifelong involvement in sports which gave me lots of background knowledge and ideas before I even started. Yuanpei later approached me to collaborate, and we were able to refine both of our ideas down to what we have now.
Our first task was to decide the topic of each page. We decided to have the first two pages cover our two main points, race and gender, and then the following three pages be examples of areas where they intersect.
On our first page we chose three items that we thought would do a good job encapsulating a wide range of interactions between race and sports. We first highlighted the unique relationship between the Florida Seminole Tribe and Florida State University athletics. Unlike many sports teams in the US, the university has the tribes permission and full support to use their name and likeness. The image of the 1968 Olympics Black Power Salute was the next item we choose. We felt that this was a great, somewhat, early example of black athletes using their global platform to bring awareness and insight change. We finished up our first page with the film 42, using its release poster as our item. The film follows Jackie Robinsons journey to breaking Major League Baseball’s color barrier and the unimaginable hardships and abuse he faced throughout and even once he was in the MLB.
Our second main connection to sports was the topic of our second page; gender. The first item we chose came from the 1967 Boston Marathon and is quite famous. The race director, Jock Semple, was upset that Katherine Switzer, a woman, was running in “his” marathon, resulting in the iconic image. We followed that up with a YouTube video Professor Hagan had sent me after my project proposal. The discussion in the video surrounds the differences in accommodations that men’s and women's basketball players got at their respective NCAA tournaments. Closing out the second page Yuanpei found a great report that connects well to our theme. It outlines a boatload of statistics on accessibility and leaders in sports for girls and young women in the US.
The third page is where we began to take both gender and race in sports and apply them to certain areas. On this page we decided to look at the impact outside of the US. The first item we had was another YouTube video, this time from LaLiga, a soccer league in Spain. A player is shown trying to inbound a ball, but before he can, a banana is thrown at him from the stands. Instead of reacting adversely, as this was clearly racially motivated, he calmly bends over and takes a bite. Following this are two articles that I am less familiar with since Yuanpei did this page, but the two topics he chose I was quite intrigued by at first glance.
Next, given the name of this project is media, we focused on the portrayal of minority athletes in sports for our fourth page. Our first item is an article focusing on the way that golf media talked about Tiger Woods. Woods is debatable one of the best golfers of all time and unlike the old school norm, is not white. Our next item is very close to me personally since I play ultimate here at MSU. But it is a criticism of the panel of analysts that selected a preseason top 25 entirely white players when there were players that deserved to be on the list that were not white. We closed the page with a very current topic in sports. The drama between LSU and Iowa in the NCAAW Basketball tournament made waves in the media and then again when peoples initial reactions were almost blatantly racist or racially motivated.
On our final page we decided to focus on money, the one thing that seemingly drives all sports in the US. Upon another suggestion by our wonderful professor, we focused somewhat on HBCU’s and their funding struggles. Our first item is a journal entry completely focused on the financial effects on HBCU’s competitive status with other universities. Our next item discusses USWNT and their lawsuit against the US Soccer Federation. The result of this lawsuit, as outlined in the article, is split pay for both men and women of all earnings from either team. Finally, we finish our project by talking about NIL deals, the new fad in college athletics. Our third item is an article that discussed the positive and negative effects on HBCU’s that the rise of NIL deals has brought.
In our opinion, the piece of information induced me to remember the topic of culture in our curriculum. We mentioned that culture is intersectional with diverse areas including tradition, international, policies, identity, art, customs, and academy. In addition, the reason why culture is related to them is that it not only represents people's think and behave, and is the whole way of living, from beliefs and norms, but also people have a trend to share a common cultural system organize and shape the physical and social world around them, and are in turn shaped by those ideas, behaviors, and physical field. In addition, the information is related to our curriculum because they both illuminated that gender discrimination is omnipresent nationally and culturally. A case in point, a black woman in a workplace has more possibilities to undergo discrimination than a white man because not only people might disdain her due to her colored race but also owing to her gender. Besides, under the culture of patriarchy, a group of people are concerned that women are inferior to men. For instance, in Think Marketing Magazine website, according to “ Women VS Patriarchy: Challenges They Face In Workplaces And How They’re Overcoming Them”, Think Marketing discerned that “ based on a true story, a woman had posted on social media before that some of her colleagues were discussing this matter and their opinions were that some men would actually find jobs if women stopped working. What people don’t know is that this goes under the description of being a ‘Sexist’”. As a result, the information confirmed to me that these people have the implicit denial issue, representing that people recognize the problem but they fail to act because they are emotionally uncomfortable or troubled about it. In this case, these people are aware of being a ‘Sexist’ and gain a little information about it, but they don't take any action, make no behavioral changes and remain apathetic. In conclusion, to overcome gender equality, men not only need to recognize the problem of “ sexism” under the culture of patriarchy, but also, they need to practice behavioral changes without an apathetic perspective and they need to treat the women as if women can accomplish their goals of their work well like the men.
Savagism, Stoicism, and the Noble Warrior: Indigenous (Mis)Representation in Media
Introduction
This exhibit seeks to further understand the extent of Indigenous representations in art, photography, education, and film media. In order to better understand that state of current representation, we must deep dive into history of master narratives of Indigenous history. The first section of this exhibit brings the audience to the 1500s, the dawn of visual representation of Indigenous peoples in the United States. This section focuses primarily on the works of three European colonists and dually-dubbed artists. The exhibit then fasts forward to the late 1800s and early 1900s in which photography was introduced to Indigenous communities. These sections were chosen as these two historic references have largely shaped the “savage” and “stoic” archetypes that plague the realm of Indigenous representation and symbolism. Second one and section 2 lead into the third section which analyzes the prevalence of re-telling Indigenous histories inaccurately and who narratives are controlled by, which leads to the fourth section. This section explores the retelling of history and reclaiming of narratives by Indigenous photographers, filmmakers, and educators. Which leads to the final page about the importance of accurate representation.
Influence of Colonists (Artists)
The origins of Indigenous mis-representation in a visual sense stems from the limnings of early European colonists. In particular, depictions of Indigenous peoples from what is now known as the continental United States were largely influenced by early Anglo colonists. Though many scholars, academics, and students believe these to be the 15th century equivalent to photography, these scholars fail to examine the context and linkages between the English conquest of Ireland and pre-dating biases that were handed to the curious, rapidly expanding British Empire from competing colonizing powers: The Spanish, Portuguese, and Italians.
Prior to the English’s colonization and forceful presence in Turtle Island, England was in the process of colonizing Ireland. Under Queen Elizabeth the 1st’s rule in the mid-1500s, the English set forth their plan to colonize the Native Irish in Gaelic areas of Ireland. The English-Protestant rule believed the Catholic Gaelic-Irish to be inferior to their own people. The devout, secular Catholicism in which the Gaelic-Irish practiced was viewed as “paganistic” and needed reform. Thus, the English moved towards colonizing Northern Ireland under the guise of defending the public good (Canny 1973, 576-578).
Prejudices held against the Irish helped shape the course of action the English would take in colonizing the Americas. On top of this, the English were not the first to step foot in the so-called “New World”. Spanish, Portuguese, and Italian conquistadores/colonizers were the first to engage in the brutal colonization of Turtle Island. After falsely believing that the Indigenous peoples of this region were Asian Indian, the competing imperialistic powers documented their “findings” of Indigenous peoples’ cultures, customs, and beliefs. These written accounts were plagued with inaccuracies powered by xenophobia (Canny 1973, 594).
Indian Photography and Curtis’s Legacy
American Indian caricaturism has followed through the centuries, up to the present day. At the end of the 1800s and early 1900s, notably during the same period as massive forms of legislation such as the Indian Removal Act, the Dawes Act, the Allotment Act, the Indian Reorganization Act, the medium of photography was developed. Although individual portraits of American Indians were prevalent prior to this period, photography has immensely shaped (and distorted) perceptions of Indigenous peoples. The “Real Life Indian” was concepted. But how “real” was this version of the “Indian”?
The Infamous Edward Curtis was an American photographer during the late 1800s-early 1900s. During this time of increased westward expansion, Curtis (and other white American)’s interest in Native populations arose. He began traveling across the country to produce still photographs of Indigenous peoples (Gascoigne 2018).
The political involvement of the progression of caricaturism from savagery and paganism to noble stoicism is important to note. Similar to realities regarding leading anthropologists conveyed in Lee Baker’s From Savage to Negro (2007), Edward Curtis was backed by President Theodore Roosevelt and political machine J.P. Morgan (Wilbur 2018).
The North American Indian, published in 1896, was a collection of thousands of photographs of Indigenous peoples in the continental United States. This piece of media was one of the largest projects completed to showcase Indigenous peoples. Many scholars, analysts, and reporters have deemed his project a “feat” in establishing visibility for Indigenous peoples (King, G. 2012). Despite this, many Indigenous peoples and communities who were impacted by Curtis’s photography and ethnographic analysts share a different perspective.
Prevalence of Caricatures
The main argument of this project is to demonstrate the prevalence and pervasiveness of American Indian Caricaturism. How has the mis-represeentation of Indigenous peoples affected spheres of education and modern media? Page three goes in depth in explaining that the pervasiveness is incredibly important in broadly assessing the impacts of Indigenous representation.
Real representations from Real Life Indians
The 4th page of the exhibit focuses primarily on contemporary works of media and resources from Indigenous creators. This section will discuss the ways in which dominant oppressive narratives are being challenged through contemporary forms of media. The intent of this section is to demonstrate how Native peoples represent themselves in their own productions and educational materials. Additionally, this section seeks to demonstrate how Indigenous peoples are counteracting previous and still-upheld distorted representations. Giving agency to Indigenous peoples for the ways in which we are represented can challenge and reshape previous representations and positively impact Native peoples.
Quality versus Quantity versus Impact: a Discussion
Lastly, the final page of my project explores discussion of quality over quantity and the importance of accurate Indigenous representation. Although there is not much concrete data (ie. peer-reviewed research articles) regarding how caricaturism impacts Indigenous peoples and our sense of self, it is abundantly clear that increased Indigenous agency in our portrayal has a positive impact on our self view.
In all, inaccurate representation may serve a purpose as it is an important aspect of retelling the story of Indigenous and American history as a whole. Accurate, real portrayals are of utmost importance and should outweigh inaccurate representations. In order to examine inaccurate representation and include this in our curricula and media, the true stories behind these mediums need to be addressed and the fact that much of what the American public believes to be true about Indigenous peoples has been fabricated, falsified, and ultimately caricaturized.
References:
Baker, Lee D. From Savage to Negro: Anthropology and the Construction of Race, 1896-1954. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press, 2007.
Canny, Nicholas P. “The Ideology of English Colonization: From Ireland to America.” The William and Mary Quarterly 30, no. 4 (1973): 575. https://doi.org/10.2307/1918596.
Gascoigne, Ellie. “Edward Curtis and ‘the North American Indian’: An Exploration of Truth and Objectivity.” Photography Ethics Centre. Photography Ethics Centre, January 27, 2022. https://www.photoethics.org/content/2021/2/24/edward-curtis-and-the-north-american-indian-an-exploration-of-truth-and-objectivity.
King, Gilbert. “Edward Curtis' Epic Project to Photograph Native Americans.” Smithsonian.com. Smithsonian Institution, March 21, 2012. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/edward-curtis-epic-project-to-photograph-native-americans-162523282/.
Bringing Awareness Towards Arab American Discrimination in a Post-9/11 Nation
This project's central topic is the issue of Arab American discrimination within America, with a particular focus on its prevalence in a post-9/11 society. In alignment with class themes and concepts, this project focuses on a particular racial group, Arab Americans, and how societal racialization and stigmatization has negatively impacted this group through discrimination. I chose this topic as I feel passionately about bringing awareness to the matter as an Arab American myself, along with many relevant items involving psychological research, an academic area I am interested in as an incoming clinical psychology PhD student. The overarching topic is divided into three primary subtopics, being an introduction of the reality of Arab American discrimination, the different ways Arab American discrimination negatively impacts members of the population, and how both Arab Americans and society as a whole can push back against the hostile environment Arab Americans have been finding themselves in for decades. These subtopics are divided into five pages within the exhibit, with the first two pages covering the first subtopic, the third page covering the second sub-topic, and the final two pages covering the last subtopic. I make 3 direct relations to class concepts through each of the three subtopics, all of which can be found later within this overview essay. This topic and much of what can be learned from all of these items are incredibly important to me and my culture, and I hope to spread awareness regarding Arab Americans and their experiences through this work.
For the first of my three central subtopics, I introduce the overarching concept of Arab American discrimination, as it is a reality of the modern Arab American condition that does not receive as much attention as it should, and one that is encouraged by our own government and politics. The first two pages of my exhibit include items that lay a foundation for understanding the issue of Arab American discrimination, and that bring awareness to the various forms it exists through. My first item is an article by Kiara Alfonseca titled 20 years after 9/11, Islamophobia continues to haunt Muslims. She discusses how Arab American discrimination has been a real issue over the last 20 years, bringing up statistics that show a huge increase in hate crimes and Arab insecurity during the time period. Not only that, but she talks about how American politics have only worsened the issue, particularly through the Islamophobic rhetoric spewed by Donald Trump during his election campaign. I chose this article as it not only introduced easily understood figures that painted the picture of the issue's existence, but it also highlighted the part our own government and politics plays in the matter, a key class connection I made between my research and course readings. Next, I include a video of an ABC News reporter interviewing residents of Dearborn, Michigan, one of America's largest Arab communities, about their experiences with discrimination since 9/11. Interviewee sentiments expressed that discrimination through avenues such as hate crimes, employment discrimination, and harassment are common, and that the anti-Muslim rhetoric expressed by Donald Trump has validated racist tendencies in Americans. I included this video as it provided more support for the place our politics have had in encouraging Arab discrimination. I then include a San Diego Tribune article by Doris Bittar and George Majeef Khoury that specifically highlights how Arab Americans are particularly unprotected within our society, along with highlighting how Palestinian Americans have been targeted by a government that doesn't advocate for the rights they deserve. It supports this through bringing up a number of examples, particularly of Palestinian Americans getting shafted through the legal system, and I chose to incorporate this article as it is important to me as a Palestinian American myself, and for how it further addresses our government's place in the issue.
The next page of the exhibit further covers the topic of outlining Arab American discrimination, with a focus on explaining the different ways Arab American discrimination has shown itself within our society. The first source of this page, an excerpt from the Journal of American Ethnic History, Louise Cainkar specifically outlines many of the ways Arab American discrimination takes form, such as through government policies, media representation, mainstream cultural representations, employment discrimination, public perceptions and attitudes, discriminatory behaviors, and social/political exclusion. She explores these issues as vessels through which the social distance has grown between Arabs and other American populations over the last few decades. I chose this source as it provided an abundance of nuanced explanation regarding many of the numerous ways Arab American discrimination takes form, many of which being relatable to me and what I have witnessed in my own life. Following this, I discuss an article within the American Studies Journal written by Ghada Quaisi Audi that further highlights the ways discrimination takes form against Arab Americans. The author specifically focuses on the domains of racial discrimination, hate crimes, employment discrimination, and civil rights issues such as racial profiling. With a number of illustrating examples under the context of a reactionary American society following 9/11, I chose this source as it excellently explores many of the difficulties one encounters as an Arab in current day America. Lastly, I chose to incorporate a tweet I myself scrolled across a couple of weeks ago. The post quote-tweets a video glorifying early 2000s high school in America with a screenshot saying that being an Arab American student during this time period was filled with a discriminatory atmosphere commonly accepted by both teachers and students. The tweet went viral on Twitter, and I incorporated because it represents how even in the current day, countless people from all over relate to having understood this occurring in post 9/11 America, and the natural, genuine nature of this evidence through Twitter helps supplement the peer-reviewed journal articles I incorporated prior.
For this subtopic, one class concept that informed and related to it was the idea of a societal atmosphere artificially fueling a discriminatory status for a minority through avenues of power, such as science, government, or politics. This was a common theme found in several class materials, initially introduced in readings from How Race is Real (Mukhopadhyay et al., 2007), and From Savage to Negro (Baker, 1998), where it was described how racially motivated scholars and scientists cultivated divisions between "races" through proposed scientific discovery that wouldn't be refuted, even though it was not founded upon by credible science. This allowed those in power with discriminatory ideologies to find a reason to put down non-majority races, a sentiment that was echoed by people within the society who were then validated for their racist views. This closely mirrors what several of these items have discussed regarding how Arab American discrimination has worsened due to the modern political landscape within America, where those with power and influence, such as Donald Trump, encourage anti-Arab government policies and spread propaganda regarding Arabs that validate racist ideologies of civilians.
The third page of my exhibit focuses on the second of my three central subtopics, being the different ways Arab American discrimination has directly impacted members of this population. Through three different items, I focus on impacts through the domains of mental health, abuse, and employment limitations. The first item is a research study, The Association of Perceived Abuse and Discrimination After September 11, 2001, With Psychological Distress, Level of Happiness, and Health Status Among Arab Americans, that utilizes a face-to-face survey sampling Arab Americans regarding their experiences with discrimination and mental health measures. The results concluded that experiences with discrimination following 9/11 have had an impact on mental health through reports of increased psychological distress and reduced levels of happiness, and I included this item as it provides clear empirical evidence for how discrimination has had a negative impact in this area. The next item I include focuses on how Arab Americans are subjected to abuse and harassment far too often: a Chicago news story covering how a Palestinian American teenager was brutally beaten by local police officers using excessive force. The local Arab community responded with both a lawsuit and a sentiment of outcry regarding this specific instance and local law enforcement tendencies of harassment and profiling against Arabs, and this instance serves to be just one example of the countless similar occurrences of such violence against Arab Americans. Lastly, I include a research paper, It's All in the Name: Employment Discrimination Against Arab Americans, that attempts to investigate if the well-documented reality of Arab American discrimination in a post 9/11 American has had an impact in employment discrimination. They conduct a study where they send out equally qualified resumes to over 250 job applications with both white and Arab names attached, in order to see if there is any difference in application success with only this variable varying. They find that the white-named applications are twice as successful as the Arab-named applications, leading them to conclude that discriminatory hiring practices are incredibly real within our nation against Arabs, and providing empirical support for yet another detrimental impact of Arab discrimination within America.
In regard to the direct impact a discriminatory culture can have on a minority group, one major class parallel I made is between the aforementioned impacts on Arab Americans, and what we learned about Asian American discrimination in Anti-Asian Racism and COVID-19 (Ho, 2020). In this article, several impacts of discrimination and harassment are mentioned. One example is the murder of Vincent Chen, a racially motivated assault that came to mind after reading the story of how an Arab American teen was excessively beaten by police officers. Another is the discussed racially fueled yellow peril sentiments that fueled an anti-Asian societal landscape, which resembles how Islamophobia was utilized for political gain at the expense of Arab Americans. One last parallel to be found here is how both Arab and Asian American discrimination rose following a major event perceived to be relevant to that ethnic group at large, being the 9/11 attacks and the COVID-19 pandemic, respectively. Both the article and several of my items discuss how countless Arabs and Asians can personally say they fear for themselves or have experienced harassment due to the rampant discrimination present in the country against their minority groups, and both minority groups must be met with positive outreach in order to improve these circumstances.
The final two pages of my exhibit tackle how both Arab Americans and our society as a whole have and can respond towards Arab American discrimination, with the fourth page specifically highlighting the ways Arab populations practice resilience against discrimination, and the fifth page focusing on what we as a society have done and can do to advocate for Arab Americans. I first include a video published by NowThis News that spreads awareness regarding Arab American heritage month, something that has only been nationally recognized since 2017. Many speakers within the interview advocate for the importance of Americans better understanding the incredibly sizable Arab population within America. The video sheds light on so many facets of Arab American culture within just a few minutes, describing the different food and items Arabs have passed on into American culture, well known Arab American celebrities, the religious diversity present in Arab American communities, and ignorance regarding this population must be extinguished in order to do away with Arab discrimination. I included this source not only for how successfully it spreads awareness about commonly held misconceptions regarding Arab Americans, but for how it advocates for the rights of this population through the voices of Arab Americans themself, particularly through the avenue of combating ignorance. The second item I included is the research article, Arab American Adolescents’ Responses to Perceived Discrimination: A Phenomenological Study, that investigates how Arab American Muslim teenagers respond against discrimination, utilizing data from 10 teenagers who have reported ethnic discrimination against them. The researchers concluded that they found 3 positive ways and 3 negative ways in which these Arab American teens responded to discrimination, which both sheds light on what might potentially be more useful to implement when coping against discrimination and what might be less useful. I included this source as it sheds light on very specific mechanisms of resilience that Arab Americans practice against discrimination, and for how it spreads awareness on how to recognize beneficial and harmful coping strategies for mental health professionals, teachers, parents, and anyone else who might read the findings. For my next item, I incorporate a photo of an Arab American protest in the Chicago area, capturing one example of Arab American community members coming together to advocate for the recognition they deserve. This specific protest is outside of a Trump hotel pushing against Trump's discriminatory propaganda against Muslims, and is paired with an article advocating for Middle Easterners to have a more applicable census option than "White". I included this photo for its visual representation of Arab American resilience through the coming together of Arabs to protest for their rights within this country, a powerful and commonplace occurrence for this marginalized group.
The final page of the exhibit continues to focus on how to respond towards the issue of Arab American discrimination, with these items focusing on how our American society can better support Arab Americans through fostering a culture where members of this population are better understood and respected. The first item is a United States Department of Justice notice that describes how their Civil Rights Division has pushed back against the acknowledged issue of Arab American discrimination since 9/11. This includes hundreds of conducted investigations regarding Arab hate crimes, discrimination in housing, education, employment, public accommodation and religious land use, along with extensive Arab American outreach programs that have been implemented. Even if the effectiveness of these federal interventions can potentially be argued, the language used and information provided on this page are beneficial in establishing an American culture that disowns Arab American discrimination, and I included it for how its content represents this concept. The next item I include is a research paper titled, School-Based Considerations for Supporting Arab American Youths’ Mental Health, which advocates for the importance of recognizing Arab Americans and their needs. After establishing that mental health is a major issue for Arab American youth, due in no small part to discrimination, the paper extensively provides fully fleshed out recommendations regarding how mental health and school-based professionals can better support this population navigate culturally unique difficulties. They advocate for the importance of cultural sensitivity and competence, and go on to say that curriculum-based widespread Middle Eastern education would go a long way in tearing down the current school climate where cultural ignorance leads to children harassing other children. I included this research paper for its extensive information pertaining to Arab Americans as a population, as well as how to better support younger generations of this population. Any reader who has any influence or interaction with American youth such as school employees, parents, or mental health professionals can learn a great deal from the information provided in this paper. For the final item of this section, I included a school district webpage providing notice of how schools within that district will celebrate Arab American heritage month in April. Federal Ways Public Schools in Washington bring attention to the prominence of Arab Americans within their community and the country at large, go on to introduce plans to hold several activities recognizing Arab Americans for students of all ages to take part in, including showcasing Arab American literature and art, activities writing out the Arabic alphabet, and displaying quotes celebrating Arab culture. The webpage states that these activities are taking place district wide across elementary, middle, and high schools, reaching youth audiences of all ages. I included this item as it represents a real-life example of how we as a society can better support Arab Americans through educating and involving the youth, and it serves to be something every school district can learn and implement from.
One last class concept that has helped inform my understanding of these last few items is the concept of how different minority groups advocate for themselves and practice resilience against marginalization and discrimination, as well as how we individually and as a society can support minority groups in such hostile climates. While relevant ideas to this concept were constant in our materials, one that specifically came to mind was what I learned about Native American communities in Native American DNA (Tallbear, 2013), and the All My Relations podcast episode (Wilbur et al., 2019). Engaging with these materials showed me how Native American communities combat the abuse of their genetic rights together, such as through the Indigenous People's Council on Biocolonialism, the International Indigenous Forum on Biocolonialism, and many other examples. These empowerment groups are a way in which Native people practice resilience against abuse, just as Arabs do the same through their own empowerment groups and other aforementioned means. Additionally, when understanding how anyone can help support Arab Americans, I related what I was learning to the "how to be an anti-racist ally" section from Anti-Asian Racism and COVID-19 (Ho, 2020). This section at the end of the article discusses how being an ally involves educating oneself about the culture at hand and its history with racism in America, correct people on their ignorance and call out insensitive comments, and learning how to act against racism, all concepts that align with and can be applied to what I learned about supporting Arab Americans from the final couple items.
The process of forming the template for my topic, researching these topics, and writing about them in a way I find personally interesting was something I found to be incredibly engaging and particularly important for an academic project. As an Arab American myself with countless family members both born here and back in Palestine, I found almost every article, video, picture, research paper, and item I came across to be personally relatable to some extent. I learned academically that while there is some exceedingly interesting research out there regarding my own culture and place within America, there is a consistent theme within the literature that there is a gap in knowledge regarding Arab Americans in comparison to other minority groups, and that there is room for so much more work to be done. As someone preparing to start a clinical psychology PhD in the Fall, this project has provided me with some personal inspiration on where I could potentially take my own research over the next few years. Personally, this work instilled in me an even greater pride in my own heritage, and it taught me even more about the specific hardships my community has faced that I wasn't aware of before. We covered a great deal in class regarding the implications of a discriminatory society on a variety of minority groups, and this served to be an incredibly fulfilling learning experience about a similar circumstance affecting Arab Americans.
An Overview of Racism and Representation of Race Within the Entertainment Industry
Introduction
In this exhibit, I will examine and talk about race/racism and its relationship with the entertainment industry. For the organization of this exhibit, it first starts with a look at the time of Old Hollywood and the status quo enforced back then. Then, it will transition into recent and more familiar times. Afterward, I will explain the concept of color-blind casting and give examples of it from movies from the past and also movies that are currently planned to be released. The two movies I plan on talking about are Rodgers and Hammerstein’s Cinderella and Disney’s live-action The Little Mermaid. During this section, I will also talk about the concept of false equivalence and how it relates to outrage regarding most color-blind casting choices. For my third page, I will talk about the idea of “gingercide” and how it is an obvious coverup for the publics' true thoughts on some casting choices. I will look at Halle Bailey as Ariel and Zendaya as MJ as my primary examples. The fourth page will focus on Disney and its problems regarding racism and targeted hate toward actors who have acted in Disney franchises. Lastly, I end the exhibit by analyzing an actress who I feel has experienced almost everything that was mentioned previously.
I was instantly drawn to do a project with this idea since I know talking about the entertainment industry is a strong suit for me. I consider myself invested in pop culture, so when I am able to bring that enjoyment into projects and work I know that my interest in said project will go up and so will my work ethic. The main point I am trying to make with this project and my items is that race and racism can be found in all corners of the entertainment industry and in many different forms.
Kiss of Death
The first page of my exhibit is titled “Kiss of Death”. The phrase “kiss of death” is used to describe something that will cause something else to fail or end in disaster. For example, one might say that if an open-minded person does not like a certain meal that would be a kiss of death for that restaurant. Or if a movie reviewer leaves a particularly scathing review it might be viewed as a kiss of death or a bad omen for things to come. I titled this specific page with this phrase since I think it accurately describes what the two actresses viewed their ancestry as. The first actress I talk about is Merle Oberon, who is most known for the film Wuthering Heights. During her time, Oberon was extremely well-known and was even nominated for an Oscar. What wasn’t known at the time was that Oberon was purposely hiding her ancestry and would continue to do so for her entire life. Oberon was born with more fair skin, but it doesn’t take away the fact she was half Indian from her mother’s side. Before her acting career started, she used many skin-bleaching techniques on herself to further present as white. At one point, when crafting her backstory, she said “her birth records had been destroyed in a fire” and even said her grandmother, who had raised her and her actual mother as sisters, was her maid since she was darker in complexion (Lawrence 2023). As for why Oberon would go to such lengths to craft such a meticulous identity that put down the family she had known all her life, the answer would be Hollywood society.
In the article talking about Merle’s life as a star, it details just how racist Hollywood was at the time: “Hollywood seized on the opportunity to police itself, adopting a set of rules known as the Hays Code- which, among many other things, frowned upon interracial romance. With representational casting essentially made illegal, studios embraced yellow and blackface” (Lawrence 2023). As said in the article, Hollywood was on no track for equality, so Oberon probably was doing what she considered was best for herself and her career. There is no way to know 100% if she would have had the success she did if she was truthful about her identity, but knowing what I know about how society treated minorities at that time it is highly unlikely. Whether that choice was right is not mine to decide, but I found her story to be very relevant to the topic I had chosen, especially since she probably isn’t the only star to pull this (but instead the only one to be found out).
Another person who came to mind while doing this project was Zoe Saldana. Zoe Saldana is known for a variety of movies and her many accomplishments. Saldana is also Afro-Latina, born to a Dominican father and a Puerto Rican mother. Despite her heritage, she has been very ambiguous at times about how she identifies and we previously talked about the act of “passing”, but this is a bit different. Most of the time Saldana only identifies or claims her latina side while disregarding the afro part. Doing this reinforces an idea that being ethnically ambiguous is the goal so you aren’t too much of one thing and on the other hand not white enough.
Colorblind Casting
My next page and set of items revolve around the topic of colorblind casting. Colorblind casting is a casting practice where things like race and ethnicity are not considered when casting characters. One of the first movies I remember watching growing up that featured colorblind casting was Rodgers and Hammerstein’s Cinderella. The movie had many stars, like Brandy, Whitney Houston, Whoopi Goldberg, and more. When I watched it I never paid too much attention to why the prince or the stepsisters were a different race than their parents, but now that I am older I can look back and see how iconic this movie and its cast was. By utilizing colorblind casting, the movie made sure that it considered a wider range of people since the source material lacked representation.
Another example of colorblind casting is a bit more recent. Disney announced that they were making a live-action rendition of The Little Mermaid featuring Halle Bailey as Ariel. As the rest of the cast was slowly revealed, people noticed that they all varied in race and ethnicity, even if some of the characters were to be related. Even though the movie isn’t out, Halle Bailey specifically and other members of the cast have received massive amounts of hate due to the fact they don’t resemble their animated counterparts. Because of the colorblind casting method used, some people have called the movie things like “woke propaganda” and refuse to watch it. Later on, I will talk more in-depth about this more so regarding the backlash Halle Bailey is receiving.
I said before that colorblind casting allows the opportunity for people to audition to know that their race won’t be a limiting factor, but truthfully sometimes it should be. In some stories, like Cinderella and The Little Mermaid, the character's race gives no meaning to their story. It plays no central part and if it was changed, the essence of the story is the same. Some people confuse changing race with changing location or nationality as well. People will say things along the lines of “Cinderella is based in France so realistically…” and plead their case as to why a minority should not be able to play these characters. In truth, changing their race doesn’t mean it automatically changes their nationality if it is truly that important to the story, so that argument is false. The argument takes a new height when people argue about the logistics of a complete fantasy world or other stories where race does play an important part. In class, we talked about marked and unmarked identities, which I feel goes with this section since being white is considered an unmarked identity while being black or a minority is considered marked. Because of this, it’s easier to see why changing one into the other could bring more representation while changing it the other way around takes representation away and feeds the majority. People like to play the “what if we changed Tiana’s or Mulan’s race” card a lot, but fail to see how changing those characters' race is nothing equivalent to changing Ariel’s or Cinderella’s. I go more into detail about this concept and how invalid it is on the specific page as well as show a tweet example.
So...what's the problem?
The third page and set of items is titled “So…what’s the problem?” where I look and try to find what people are finding so angering about casting these days. One of the main things I saw was regarding the concept of “gingercide”. “Gingercide” is a word commonly used when people are talking about the casting of non-gingers in roles of previous ginger-held roles. The word is usually used to make fun of people who think it is a serious problem, but some people do consider it a serious problem. One of the items I found about this is a Facebook post that shows a picture collage of multiple characters who were originally ginger but were a victim of “gingercide” or another term they used called “blackwashing”, which is the concept of changing a character's race to black. What I found most surprising about this post is the fact that some of them still have red hair, so if the hair wasn’t the problem then what could it have been? The answer is the actor's race. All of the live-action counterparts shown are minorities and even if they do keep the hair color of their counterpart, they are still subjected to ridicule and hate every single day.
A couple of people who came to mind before I saw this post who were also in it include Zendaya and her portrayal of MJ in the Marvel Spider-Man trilogy and also Halle Bailey portraying Ariel in The Little Mermaid live-action. Marvel has said many times that Zendaya’s character is not meant to be a direct adaption of Mary-Jane Watson which is what many people think. Despite this being clarified many times, people still compare the two characters and subject Zendaya to much hate for her portrayal and even the fact that she doesn’t have red hair like her supposed comic counterpart. Halle Bailey also is subject to ridicule even though she does have ginger hair, instead, people focus on the fact that her hair is in locs and not exactly how it is in the animated movies. This tiny detail, once again, is not important and is nothing more than an excuse to direct anger at Halle due to her casting which is viewed as “blackwashing”. The locs follow the same physics any hair would underwater and still look realistic. The reaction shows that even if you have an actress who has some of the most prominent and recognizable features of her counterpart (ex: Ariel’s red hair) and who also has an amazing singing voice, people will not be happy under the circumstances. Another person who is included in the Facebook post item is Anna Diop’s portrayal of Starfire versus her comic counterpart. I go more in-depth about Anna Diop and her experiences on a separate page later on.
Disney has problems!
The fourth page is titled “Disney has problems!” and focuses specifically on Disney’s franchises and their history with racism and race regarding their movies. Other Disney projects were mentioned beforehand, but these ones are more related since two of them are from the same franchise and one of them is extremely recent.
As said, two of the items I chose are from the same franchise: Star Wars. Kelly Marie Tran is a 34-year-old Vietnamese-American actress who portrays Rose Tico in the most recent star wars trilogy. She was the first Asian-American woman with a major role in Star Wars for her portrayal of Rose, but ended up facing a violent hate train that led to her shutting down her social media accounts. The comments made ranged from being racist to sexist and all came from no clear reason other than spite or dislike. Disney seems to not do the best job at protecting its actors from hate as this is similar to another character and actor pair from a couple of movies back. Jar Jar Binks is a Star Wars character who is also highly disliked and whose actor faced scathing comments. It got to the point where the actor, Ahmed Best, came out and said the intensity of the comments made him need to retreat for years since he was losing himself. In the end, he recently made an appearance in the show The Mandalorian where many were happy to see him back in the franchise with a second chance.
Another current situation going on with Disney has to do with their new live-action Lilo & Stitch. They announced they were making a live-action version of the beloved movie not too long ago and only recently did the beginning of the cast start to roll out. One of the first people who revealed was Lilo’s live-action actress who received a positive response. Some of the next ones, however, did not. The actors for Nani and Daniel were released a couple of weeks after and received lots of backlash. The reveal of the live-action actress for Nani was immediately met with upset reactions due to the fact they cast a lighter-skinned Polynesian rather than someone closer to Nani’s skin tone or someone who shared her features. In the article inside of the page, it says: “Nani’s looks were a big part of what made Lilo & Stitch iconic for many folks in the PI community. With her brown skin and body shape, Nani became the first mainstream representation for many Pacific Islanders” (Sloss 2023). Similar reactions were had when the actor for David was also originally portrayed by a lighter-skinned Polynesian until people found evidence that the actor was racist in the past and he got a much-needed recast. So far, Disney has not commented about anything regarding the casting but it goes to show how vast and different their choices can be when casting things like the live-action Little Mermaid versus Lilo & Stitch.
Case Study: Anna Diop
The 5th and last page is titled “Case Study: Anna Diop”, this is because I will be looking at one specific actress and her experiences regarding race and racism in the entertainment industry. Anna Diop is a Senegalese-American actress who has been in many different movies and shows like Nanny, Titans, and Us. In the show Titans she portrays a live-action version of the beloved character Koriand’r, more commonly known as Starfire. As a big Starfire fan, I was extremely excited to see her in live-action and to see her be played by a black actress. While other people were excited, there were many who had negative reactions and made it known.
One common thing regarding Starfire that people point out is how often her looks change. In her older comic appearances, she had more curly thick hair and other features that are commonly associated with black women, nowadays she has lost most of her original traits. When the first pictures of Anna Diop as Starfire hit the internet, she was met with wave after wave of racist comments. The comments almost always focused on her hair, which was a pretty comic-accurate color and also more accurate to the original look, or the fact that she wasn’t orange. Obviously, Starfires orange hue is completely unattainable for anybody to naturally have but even so, people think a black woman especially cannot play her. It goes to show that even if a character is portrayed to be black, people will not accept it unless it is explicitly stated. Diop eventually limited her social media presence like Kelly Marie Tran and others after people “were quick to react with outright racism and hate speech” (Abad-Santos 2018). The article continues to go on to talk about how Diop addressed the comments but is still experiencing a high level of attacks. The last item I put was a link to a youtube video where Anna Diop talks about an experience she had on set. She talks about how a showrunner told her that he wouldn’t change the lighting for her even though it was not flattering to her skin tone because he had to prioritize her lighter co-stars over her. The comment was flat-out colorist and disgusting, and as a viewer, I disliked the blue tone and feel like it would've been best to get rid of it entirely. I was simultaneously surprised and not surprised by this since I would’ve thought that these things might happen in what is supposed to be a professional work environment, but I still hoped they didn’t.